Ada permulaan cerita, peran baik, buruk, sukses, gagal, skenario dan akhir cerita.
Bukankah begitu cara kita menghadapi era globalisasi. Di tambah dengan dunia digital, terlalu sempit imajinasi kita untuk menangkap sesuatu. Keadaan yang mungkin membalikkan arah solusi, walaupun luasnya lautan informasi sudah mudah didapatkan. Bukankah itu yang menyebabkan kita takut terhadap transformasi?
Kita benar — benar sudah merasakan bagaimana dunia teknologi sekarang di pertengahan abad ke-21. Setiap tahunnya, menunggu apa langkah selanjutnya dari sebuah inovasi. Mungkin awal dari abad 21 atau akhir abad 20 masih menjadi imajinasi kita untuk menangani masalah di sekitar kita. Sekarang pertanyannya, apakah cerita ini masih berlanjut?
Sekilas tentang cara menemukan ide dalam inovasi, bagaimana prosesnya?. Mulai dari hal — hal kecil di sekitar kita atau passion yang sedang kita nikmati, apakah ada titik yang menyebabkan masalah, mulai dari tidak efektif, tidak membawa pengaruh besar atau menganggu sekitar dan memanipulasi hal tersebut higga menjadi solusi. Sangat sederhana pembawannya hingga menjadi topik bisnis dari kesuksesan ide tersebut.
Kenapa permasalahan transformasi ini baru muncul?
Oke untuk dari inovasi internet lambat menjadi internet cepat, itu transformasi yang tidak bermasalah, . Inovasi sudah lebih dari sekedar cukup dan karena itu banyak orang menyadari kenapa permasalahan transformasi ini baru muncul?, teknologi yang akan menggantikan pekerjaan kita?, kini ilmu mudah didapatkan dari internet sehingga banyak orang genius di luar sana tanpa berpendidikan formal atau semua kini serba instan. Menjelaskan definisi internet sudah sangat luas, apalagi teknologi sendiri. Teknologi terbentuk karena simulasi pikiran kita, misal jika sedang berjalan lambat, apa yang harus kita dapatkan agar menjadi cepat dan itu sudah menjadi pengalaman yang harus diterapkan, karena sebagai manusia kadang tidak merasa puas di sekitarnya.
Jika teknologi adalah bagian kehidupan kita, kenapa kita harus merasa terjepit dengan ‘disruption’ atau era baru dari transformasi.
Jelas ini adalah pemikiran orang bisnis dan mereka bukan pemain sejati, sehingga tidak peduli dengan linkungan sumber daya pekerja mereka, berpikir lebih dengankeluar dari zona nyaman mungkin sudah bukan menjadi prioritas. Itulah kenapa, perusahaan teknologi sekarang semuanya hampir memiliki prinsip yang sama, saling berlomba untuk menjadi yang tercanggih, bukan memprioritaskan pelanggannya.
Aku ingin lebih dalam menyikapinya dan kembali ke pertanyaan atau beberapa dasar. Apakah teknologi kita benar — benar sudah mencukupi aktifitas kita?, sekarang zaman kita bukan lagi tahap belajar dengan teknologi, ini sudah bagian kehidupan kita. Salah satu inovasi yang benar — benar mengubah kehidupan kita adalah komputer, bermula dari menghitung matematika, sekarang menjadi pelengkap segala hal dan meminimalisir menjadi alat komunikasi atau jam pintar. Jadi, tidak ada yang original di sini dan itu pun juga tergantung dengan passion kita. Dengan ini bisa menjelaskan kenapa transformasi itu ada, dorongan di mana inovasi kini menjadi lebih unik. Mungkin unik belum cukup menjelaskannya, tapi unik menjadikannya tidak biasa dan pengalaman baru.
Secara tidak sadar, ini sudah menganggap sebagai transformasi dan pemain lain akan mengikuti langkah keunikan kamu. Pemain lain adalah orang — orang yang benar — benar terpengaruhi oleh transformasi kamu. Kenapa?
Orang yang berbisnis teknologi hanya sekedar berbisnis akan kurang sensitif dengan keadaan dunia bisnis sekarang. Mereka tidak hanya menambahkan hal inovatif, tapi mungkin kreatifitas. Kreatifitas bakal melihatkan jati diri dari perusahaan dan mendapatkan prinsip mereka secara mudah. Pengaruh dari transformasi pihak lain akan kebal lapisannya, karena kita bakal mengembangkan prinsip kita dengan membuat transformasi tersendiri.
Jadi solusinya bukanlah sebuah solusi, namun keyakinan.
Emotions, Motivations, Knowledge and Inspirations is the tools of business. Place, time and human is the interactions of business and money is the living of business. Now, how’re we writing the story of business?
We really realise benefits by the living of data, business players could make an station or airport of data where data would work their mission. That’s why, Possibility of every field of business can make their own platform or API business.
It’s not for technological or internet business at all. After, we have became native in digital experience. It’s kind of side-product in sharing economy to each other, making bridge of content’s owner to platform maker and users. API (Application Programming Interface) expects business strategy doesn’t build for their just purpose in products or service, but build an empathy of caring people.
API owners just find the probability in the scaling of different aspects, like regions, startup zone or local developers. Whether, it could make a new personalised platform from every API-hunter or benefits system for third-party.
API isn’t about building of empathy (share or care), but responsible in collaboration of contents, users . When, it’s time to get intersection in your products, this step which brings how you’re modelling your revenue. There are various methods to embeds it. Distracted of promotions or forced to buy products. Because, impressions in your API contents. Where business strategy are made by data, automation in the platform do their executions, analytics see your potentials.
It might enjoy your moments how business plan is played by multiple target’s user of API experience.
You’ll get the transformation and competitors wouldn’t get leads ahead in market and digital can adapt from the new environment of data.
non-tech companies whose have many data that can surrounds their potential, they might not introduced in technological experience, but a lot of data could bring the next identity to innovate beyond capabilities of digital products.
The experimental concept to read how dominant your innovation in various aspects.
Imagine, there is room which have three things of human’s creation. First is book, second is TV and the last is internet. Reflection of these are contents and can influence our mind. But, they’re made in the differences age.
Television is canvas of contents. Then, it’s controlled by every owners of channels and gains their consumers with attraction. What they have to achieve is find the keys of impression. People whose like consuming daily-news or enjoying fun with cartoon, it’s their options. However, the restrictions comes by a weakness of TV, it’s about access.
Internet is the next capability from television, we’re sharing each other, between content’s owner to user and also response it. Showing a perfection of information, but internet’s restrictions never see positive or negative feedback.
Book looks like natural in around us, minimalism in his position unlike TV and Internet. Then, doesn’t wanna attract us, but we have to come for them. There’s requirement for getting interactive by book, it’s kind of inspirations. And a result may be a bigger influence than others.
So, we have identified every objects. Now, i would like to see first-impression by this human. ‘Why does he/she choose it?’, Too general for answering this, but we understand these are innovations of the sharing information. User can meditate some theory if book is chose, User can explore in different opinions if internet is chose and user can get visualisation and show the summary of contents if television is chose. Just imagine what’s reflection which human did in these objects.
After build a relationship with them, what kind of contribution from human, We must have a goal from the affection of these innovation. We can’t just say enjoying comfortably, but conclusion after we consumed. Then, fill the respective between each other, telepathy in neediness.
This judge kit gives us more possibility in having more the reason by comparable. We can clear why Now, it’s time to fill your innovation and other things that related. It’s not just about every innovation in one categorised, you can compare in competitive or past-related things. The most important part is about human experience simulation from this room.
If you plan about modelling business, give elements of sensitivity in your thing and compare with competitor in your opinion. This simulation isn’t about building of process, but judging if you’re executed your impact. For me, it’s really effective.
Our inner feelings to develop big data assets. Never expected to be advanced, actually the vision is just get simplified. How magical in these processes.
Togetherness of data’s objects is bringing the system in doing their systems. Those group whose make it vulnerability just getting the expression of big data. It’s too focused on data learning, algorithm systematics and advanced queries. A common problems in this case just follows a condition growing industry level and sometimes can’t make adaption with it.
A transformation is good. But, realisation of transformation needs to be readable of the contexts. In Enterprise insights, it doesn’t have to innovate in their IT services or not. Everything must be following in one mission. Complexity can be appeared if one categorised layers can’t adapt collaborative from one of their members. That’s why, they have too prepared in the new experience and behaviour’s change. Platform is just a foundation.
Completely unbalanced when experience is taking off from it. And also ambiguous. Companies have realised in these situations. But, enterprise is just following the process what practical they’ve experience. Taking a risk is different, it’s related with experimental. Indeed, they’re not trying to be openable of problem, fast-growing of business competitions is afraid of lose leading in headlines. That’s the reason, they’re closing a problem to think it again of their environments.
Complexity can be appeared if one categorised layers can’t adapt collaborative from one of their members.
We need some delightful experience that is feeling hard to achieve, business never expected to tell their story constantly. And, Enterprise have a life to be responsive, it’s too far from what they’ve realised. Because transformation of business Intelligence isn’t about IT services at all, it’s relation with everything that participated.
So, complex feeling is depending the impact of your insights. Then, because this thing is mostly noticed in critique, the solutions is just consistent with your concept for their enterprise.
I’m really interesting with the transformation for business insights. Indeed, this field is categorised with complexity. When i see the design have more ability in experience simulated. That’s why, it could be possible when design is going to participated in this research.
In the business’s environment, their story is unexpectedly change from one scenario to another scenarios. It can be good or bad. Business’s environment to see the explanation of their culture is more sensitivity in their failure than success. Because, their experience for facing the process is unforgettable that actually can be various reasons in their execution. Precisely, the management of IT services can also affect them. Never mind, it’s technological aspect discussion or not. Our digital experience now is more comfortable for the next transformation today. Beginning with this realisation, we try to see the background’s problem firstly.
Their service sometimes can be failure’s reason. Most of all, that can be mysterious’s problem.
They’re holding the updatable technology in this digital era, because they can’t adapt quickly. That’s why we need the new thinking to consume technology smartly.
Take actions like risk is getting out from your comfort zone. This is how we do playing of business.
Then, our vision when i analysis in this background. I’ve did some of purposes to take deeply from my imagination for the next generation and born the new idea and more basics fundamental to see, how the steps of designer is taking approach?
I’ve come with question ‘Why Enterprise Need Design?’, so many answers out there to get first experience. For me, I wanna make enterprise is trusted with simplicity and enjoyable. Even it’s mate to get this intersection. So i put the design circle in the centre of foundation in enterprise and many components from IT services is following. Then, i make my own theory how visual thinking is taking this disease’s enterprise and migrate for their healing.
Problem and Visual Thinking would get more outlook in the parent of problems that slowly is following their child
Then, Visual Thinking is moving to solution methods to manipulate the culture what they made it in perspective’s problem need.
This is enough for our innovation process basically.
More visual in ‘The Process Of Innovation’ is bringing the following path how visual thinking is integrated in this formula. I hope, we could take it more detail. Because, it’s just the general.
Then, i’ve made a three steps for the merged between ‘problem’ method and ‘visual thinking’ method. First, ‘Analysis’. Second, ‘Experience’ and lastly, ‘Integration’. I wanna take a explanation in analysis method. This is how we’re starting to adapt the problems. Got the best chance to see their problem is try to simulate the ecosystem.
When we’ve touched their culture. Problem can be heard everywhere. In analysis method is the difficult one actually. I’ve mentioned playing in the simulation in their culture is another sub-process. You will see the inside of their behaviour, activity or how company in various conditions. As design thinker, we must open our ears widely and response intellectually. After that, find their possibility. And also, are your vision is same feeling with them.
I have visual story-telling to more understandable in this journey. Business’s people really just told the reflection in their business. Now, our challenge is filtering their statement that have the potential for our purpose in this case. And also there must be persuasive for your responses.
In the fear of transformations, some company may feel what they have a risk imaginatively. So designers must get the negotiation friendly and don’t be too serious for these explanations. Try with asking some questions, mostly design thinkers recommended with ‘why’, it would connected what’s their integration need.
This is how we developed the analytics. We have their priority to answer their real questions. Now the next structured, We have to scaled with business’s solution process. Integration would fill in there. Secondly, this is ‘experience’. This method would show how design thinker works. Unpredictable, what you think.
Building the experience is needing fundamentals firstly. We’re going back to classical design whose design thinkers do their brainstorming visual thinking.
Framework is our configuration for the new canvas, we would do some experimental in first fundamental.
Elements are our objects to put in the framework and their combination would see the judgement of your experience.
Style is your opinions to get approachable of perfection. It’s finishing in this experience method.
But, it’s too general in their fundamental, we need more advanced for enterprise experience. So, i modified them with business’s perspective.
We have the Enterprise-Centered Design. We would look more detailed. First of all, Framework is your new canvas to see how their adaptation tool or find the best matched of your foundation before you feel it. Then, i mentioned the simulation of culture in matter, somehow this framework need to be working on motive scenario. This is place how we manipulated the culture. And, it’s not inconsistent for every spot in framework or relative, because there are process to wait their new experience.
Then, Elements. This is your tools to fill the objects or layer in the framework, there are many options. Follow what you need, don’t too much. It’s not good, can’t be getting impact of simplicity.
The lastly is your own beautiful. Style is how you craft the story and find the meaning what you’ve put the elements in framework. Find some interactions of object released with efficiency.
It’s more comfortable if we have a framework like storyboard. The next is about combine everything in one place with timeline of your scenario. This is just finding the new experience generally how should be your company take their execution for insights. Somehow, story-telling is more efficient.
Third is about the integration. We’ve made the new experience theoretically and now we have to discuss with IT services, what a kind of innovation would born in our transformations.
We would feel our experience from this integration of platform. So, we must take benefits each other. And our story with style fundamental in experience method would continue here.
Here we are the more detailed in style is about connected your idea that can describe uniqueness and more breakthrough of your platform. Even empathy for example.
Now, we need to get more interactions with IT services. We have to know what’s trending topic right now in information technology services. Because Information technology is one of the field from computer science that’s growing fast.
Then we put our dresses that would be the various stylish for platform. These are simulation case for every field in IT services. I tried to experiment the new experience from visual thinking in these case and got back their basics.
Start with ‘The Stylish Experience Of Internet Of Thing’. It’s about connected experience where you should get benefits on their communications system.
Case 2 ‘The Stylish Experience Of Cloud Computing’. Kind of weird actually because cloud computing is focusing on infrastructure. However, the structure like tree explain in every innovation of cloud computing.
Case 3 ‘The Stylish Experience Of Cyber Security’ is described what’s inside in their traffic visually and motivate in taking a risk. Cyber security sometimes be treated with dark colours that imagined uncomfortable in their strategy. So, i recommended when designing it with fresh colours.
Case 5 ‘The Stylish Experience Of Mobile Era’ is the easy one. Our mobility thinking in platform is gaining popularity. Because, This is the front-end in claiming of data.
This is the ending our runway, now we’re going to take everything what we created from analysis, then experience until integration. It’s time for commercial and the judgement from our building.
Deploy for the new nature of your business activities. We would like to reform our outlooks and ready with the new weapons for the next levels. It’s perpetual, we never expected what’s next would be our company is conditioned. And it’s not just depends high technological of your enterprise, but between subjects and objects must build the relationship to take a new collaborations.
My vision with design thinking to take an action of enterprise is just overriding with confidence. Outpace in outstanding of design is bringing more journey for me. If you’re asking where should we begin with how we build the transformation, start with design thinking basically. It may indirectly you have used this method.
The context in pinky pattern for the forms of circles and places of rectangle. Bringing to destr0ys the perfection of shape role with the hidden elements.
The Interactions of Circles for Predictive Analytics Architecture
We’ve got to back basics again to reform the crafting of our processes.
Circle is the prestigious shape and have uniqueness than the others. Purposely, it’s kind of mysterious whose we need identified it. In our perspective today is about business intelligence with the ability of visual thinking, when i decided to what comes first in this journey. I got the basics from circle and explore consistently. When i’ve got played it, i have crafted in many possibility ways. In one space, circle could do anything what their functions to be, although it’s too universal. That’s why our respective for the shape especially circle need to see the meanings in every side. Oh yes, circle never have side and it’s too perfect. I’ve developed indirect in ambiguous one. But precisely, circle is openable shape. Two roles that matched in BI (Business Intelligence). Firstly, we need talk their identification and compare them with data.
First, it’s freedom. Circle have every control in their around. That’s why circle can take every contexts for the new interactions. Like in this featured image today. Now, we need take his benefits from it and try to control what conditions should be. However, there are critiques for circle. Their movement looks like want to be dominant and perpetual, it can be the reasons circle is the shape of inconsistent. Different with rectangle, it moves in their head ways. Our services with data may have the reflection from freedom of circle, although it’s so many properties metadata, their object is manufactured consistently. Data is moving when calculation is executed. The basics from circle’s object is more advanced when data got this reality.
Second, it’s more impacted easily. Circle is the shape whose never have guide in their influences, but their magnetic is the sensitive one. Inconsistent in their movement what we’ve mentioned can take the judgement without the reason logically. Our business intelligence methods now is taking the results in predictive not completely. The methods of data is approaching with what the circle have. When data is in the step of querying, their preparation is reading in around of theirs data until get identified clearly, then the next step is the results. Indeed, data have their guide when circle never knows what impact in their around.
We have the theory how basic the circle in the beneficial of data. The experience of data is complex when we don’t know what kind of vision in our business plan. So, in the comparable between circle and data is just their perfection what we need. When circle doesn’t be consistent but data have the mission to get relationship completely. The challenge of this experience of data to get emotion or intelligence in our own way is how you will craft the circle.
Let’s craft the circle in grouped. This is showing of collaborative objects or data or we can change many simulation, it can be employees of group whose brainstorms their next plan. It can be metadata of data whose analysis each others to be the new data. It sounds good. But hold on a second, i wanna tell the next one.
In another, let’s craft the circle in lines which the first is getting bigger. This is how you follow the leaders visually or the smaller is influenced. The reason of their emotion to get categorise, this is how the works imaginatively. That’s why we have the options, between ‘following and ‘followers’. In this actionable method with property of emotion, data could have different options. That’s why we always mentioned big data given with approachable to be true. It’s just following to others and be the family. The next step is about the process of making decisions.
Let’s going advance in grouped circle. In this case, how the grouped of circle can have the ability pre-supported of results in planning until they have realised in field. Simulation in the roles of circle can make me to get the fundamental, how significant can they participated effectively?. Indeed, All their members have same colour, it can make data intelligence is outputting fatal. So, to solve this mistake. I wanna change some circles in different colour, that’s blue in two objects. Still error because of the same agreement. Then, one of them should change colour which more dominant can win to get the result in the new data transformation. Actually, when one of these circle changed their colour, looks like doesn’t be consistent in their principal. I wanna fix this in more reality, take another elements to join in their group to be third-party of decisions meeting, so the result is more actual.
We could imagine more just play with their positions of freedom circle to craft the process’s story. Now, i’m going to combine from group-to-group or follow-to-follow can shape many experience. Like inconsistent decisions noticed with error logs. We need dominant agreement to see this predictive completed. Because every circle have the many differences properties in their business’s field after many identification. Then, in this case is about collaborative between different fields, like from marketing team and sales team to combine their results of group-to-group to make a new data again. Don’t judge how bad or success their data results, because it depends on the experience of business’s execution.
Then, how small circle could join what they can adapt. When green’s circle is taking the group that have leaders between red and blue colours, data or this circle wouldn’t make a new formations that doesn’t have more advanced principal in in their results, they would be circle that doesn’t have vision. When in the follow-to-follow circle have dominant colours like more in red’s circles, we would say this group is red circles group, although they have blue circle members.
In this architecting of circle how realization for data is take benefits that data doesn’t have ego. Automation system what we put in our platform can move freedom when data knows what’s inside in their contents to take friendly with another data. When the metadata is bad for their purposes, they would find collective data that have bad properties too. It may have differences level which enterprise always say clusters.
In this clusters form have differences scale of circle. The biggest and less are in high level. And the another circles is following their leader’s tail. However, whose in the middle or lower cluster is more quantities. The uniqueness in here is they’re intersecting with the high levels. When they’re not intersecting, differences colours wouldn’t related in their lines. In management data of IT services, sometimes we called priority data that created from analytics data in the lower cluster. The lower must simplify their detailed to simplify for the high cluster. It may means for giving the services for different customers or conclusions of the report for directors’s company.
Now, the next case is about seeing the potentials. The form of circles with differences attitude, personality or ambitious is the same like detectives to seeing the one answer in many questions. In this case, circle just commanded to complete their puzzle. Let’s say data is seeing from doesn’t know anything in their customer base, now this data could have profiling the condition what potential does need. Profiling is popular big data study. So, in here, circle with blacked one just adapted with arrangement of circles to see the visibility and influencing them with this circle’s plan, be another black. Data must have the ability like that from this basics form of circle, today profiling data is just beginning with customer relationships. Not just about knowing their interests with your service, data can send the telepathy to users indirectly. Data must discover what they need, before customers find them.
What small circle did in their group and arrangement make the results of new data. Profiling is the last chapter for them to see their execution in the public customer base. What they got in their predictive answers or decisions would apply them in this chapter. Customers could feel the impact what your business is doing in the new integration.
The ability from the forms of circles is discovering the fundamental of big data is just the beginning. In this visual-research is just about the elements by shape and colours. I didn’t yet added some calculation or technical studies that would disappear your focuses on business experience. That’s why, when going back to basics would reform what you’re thinking, just forget first in data learning or algorithms.
Semua layanan belanja online memiliki fitur ini. Fitur ini tidak menjadi perbincangan utama dalam pemasaran bisnis belanja online, namun para pengembang selalu mengesampingkan fitur ini. Menurut opini aku, fitur ini tidak terlalu diterapkan oleh pengguna. Padahal, ‘Wishlist’ memiliki makna yang sangat mendalam.
Desainer UX menyebutnya sebagai fitur ‘micro-interaction’, kecil namun fungsinya besar.
Kenapa makna yang mendalam?
Aku ingin membahas sebuah masalah yang tidak pernah selesai atas kesadaran para pengguna di Internet. Penyebaran musik bajakan tidak pernah habis ceritanya, musisi selalu mencari bagaimana mencegah hal ini agar tidak menjadi kebiasaan. Menurutku, caranya hanya tergantung kepada kesadaran dan rasa empati pengguna, terhadap kerja keras para musisi berkarya. Berkat fitur ‘Wishlist’, kamu merasa termotivasi bekerja keras agar mendapatkan karya mereka. Seandainya saja, musisi bisa melihat nama yang membeli karya mereka. Betapa bangga-nya nanti diri mereka, termasuk para pembeli.
‘Wishlist’ bakal membuat kamu gatal untuk mendapatkan apa yang kamu inginkan, terus menggoda kamu, agar kamu selalu bekerja keras untuk mendapatkannya. Selain itu, ‘Wishlist’ akan menahan nafsu kamu terlebih dahulu agar bisa mengatur keuangan kamu mana yang lebih diprioritaskan terlebih dahulu, tenang saja, ‘Wishlist’ tidak akan pernah melupakan keinginan kamu.
Jika kamu ingin mendapatkan sesuatu dari internet yang bersifat hak cipta atau barang. Jika belum mampu, jangan terlalu nafsu dan mencari hal alternatif lainnya, yang bisa merugi pihak penjual atau pemilik karya. Cobalah minta bantuan dari ‘Wishlist’, siapa tahu fitur ini membantu kamu untuk ke depannya.
It’s more understandable to sense it and city’s vision can integrate it.
In the playground activity, children may don’t know in their first sight. But their creativity and their pure thinking could test their response with those object to give their emotional judgement.
Let’s say (for example), one of the kids get the mini-car toy in the playground. Children still feel strange with this object, even they have seen the car in children book or advice by their parents. Because they never touched it firstly. It’s time to explore. His eyes catch something noticeable in their life before, there is chair in the car. It’s familiar for him and the next step may be the risk for this kid. Children’s attitude never be afraid, if they didn’t feel it first. Without look around, this kid just wanna sit in there. There are potential between success and fail. However, before that. Why does children interest in this mini car and explore it immediately?. It could be colourful, interactive and attractive. Their sensitivity to explore and learn is high. That’s why every parents put something decoration which is colourful and fun in their room to affect when they grow up.
‘Playground design is influenced by the intended purpose and audience.’ — Wikipedia
So, this is the background. The big question is ‘Can Smart City affect the users like playground affect their children?’. You know, it’s more simple than the process of playground before. Because users have experienced what they have learned in around them. So, their objects depend on them must reboot with more innovation and attraction elements. When children try to learn, in differently, the users try to simplify the solution. So, when i compared to each others, it’s more understandable. Why?, because users would get out from their zone that discomfort after realised it. It’s time for designer, innovator or entrepreneur chance to be hero.
Then, how we got the deep inside the process. This process generally how we innovate something, but their judgement to become commercial is more readable in the adaption of Smart City.
First step is Problem to Solution, then Explore — Adaptation and Judgement.
Problem : Where there are crowds that’s rising the voice hardly. That’s problem comes from. We could begin the first method of the process, with analysis the problem. Civil realize that there are another ways to simplify it.
Solution : After we have conclusion in the problem’s situation. It’s time to review and invent it. Don’t be ego first. Because the next step is integration with citizens. Smart City inventor never forget to add elements of innovative and attractive, it depends with your sector.
Explore : In the playground activity, children needs to learn first. In civilisation, users are exploring first, they need to know the feature and services what we give. When innovator analysis the problem and give answer with the solution, Users analysis the solution and give the conclusion.
Adaptation : This is the conclusion where users give the answer indirectly. You need to know what users give feedback or critical within the time and their consistency.
Judgement : It’s time to judge your efficient. There are potential between success and failure. Even it’s automation or users use it for their services, users can influenced easily and it would be disruptive.
The Development of Smart City just to know what kind of potential that users gave. The born of problem to give their potential is coming from to know each other. Our culture for daily activity doesn’t comes from influencers or expert. It’s a crowd that give their voice. This is the potential. You can’t say our culture doesn’t get beyond enough, because the people still enjoy what they matters.
Now, it’s time for market zone. This isn’t about find the chance of success. This is the time to find the needy of crowd. It depends on their passion. In the playground, children is a bit of confused what should they’re playing. In their reflect, they chose one of the most crowding playing. Same with Smart City, this development must know the keys of attractive, it’s not enough with just innovation. The keys is really simple, just follow your passion, what are you facing the problem today in your moments. Your study or field could see more approachable effective to make a solution, they’ve experienced with it.
In this graphic data are the potential indicator of Smart City from my opinion to visual. There are two different sectors for Smart City, it’s about business management, enterprise in private sector, then service or culture in public sector.
Now, let’s talk about the potential of public sector first. In the process of Smart City activity, innovators are the key of strategist and manipulator. They’re manage the time and build every steps for their solution. The resident and population of Smart City is the subjects in the strategy of innovator. Players must follow the process in step-by-step to get solution is run. Let’s take a look the MRT of Singapore, their resident is like playing game, which following every steps to get their services to reach their destination and the automation platform just coach people to how their cycle is managed simplified and people could enjoy it everyday consistently, without face the issue personally.
Innovate in Smart City, your platform must like tutor with ask the question first. ‘How we people enjoy with our solution?’, if there are the problem in one of those steps of platform. People can’t finish your solution process and leave it immediately. Ya, this is the failure of solution. People wouldn’t care about it anymore, even it’s smart idea. People even back to the past process. Let’s say you put the computer in the around of city for people to get efficient information, mostly i may say, they’re just first impression users. This is their judgement to get truly to define the solution why computer is matter in here. So in public sector, you must truly get to listen what’s resident talking about in their situation, and put your solution in there.
Second, Private Sector is less sensitive with their problem after they response the issue. They focus on the result and time management, then their habit sometimes hide the problem to achieve what they want in their plan. Because, they do their daily activity with just convention. So, to innovate in Enterprise must take a lot of time to manipulate their culture job. However, one of their management subject may be visionary. Sometimes, if the company have succeed. It’s their time to find the efficient for their platform. They may need intelligence for their analytical data or noticeable system in integration of every team. The problem of company unexpectedly always appears, in their plan or customers issue.
With their surprised problem, sometimes their platform could be their performer. Their technologies couldn’t face the problem or be unknown with the issue. This is the switch button for their management to get efficient in their platform. Especially for this field, Environment architecture must sensitive with Smart City, they’re underground platform that affect in every single object of City. I would say Environment (Electricity, Water System and etc.) are the balance between public and private sector. Their process in private sector and the results in the public sector.
Let’s back to playground again, there is thing with name Seesaw. As one goes up, the other goes down. It’s constantly get movement like that and very little possibility to get balance. It’s action that we just adapt it and accidentally bring our effect of power to them. Seesaw is the next generation platform process that’s tastefully for Smart City field. It’s automation and intelligence method. When Players of Seesaw give the power to be dominant than another players. One of the platforms in every category must know the condition of their users and what affects for them. Thanks for Big Data, it’s intersect to each others. Directly, Users need to react for them after their platform give the react first. Every each other must get advantage in the result of process. The platform give their information, users must feel they have got the information they need.
My perspective to explore in smart city have ended with the conclusion. Let’s review it.
Find the crowd that rising their voice, that’s problem come.
It’s not just about innovative about your solution, added with attractive.
Solution is appeared after users followed your strategy and steps to get it
Between users and platform must have benefit each other.